e/acc

/eff-acc3206

Conversations about effective accelerationism

My tentative bottom line is: solar + batteries can be great for specific applications that don’t need very high availability; and they can work as part of an overall system of supplying power to the grid; but they won’t supply all power to the grid in the foreseeable future. My current, partial understanding of a tricky question:

https://newsletter.rootsofprogress.org/p/how-much-does-it-cost-to-back-up
imho, humanity's ability to perturb both nature and entirely imaginary constructs should indicate that we possess a quality that cannot be paperclipped.

also, I think smartglasses perturb more than just FPV encoding, rather it can even falsify all hypotheses that involve FPV observation.

https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.11646

Adversarial Data Collection: Human-Collaborative Perturbations for Efficient and Robust Robotic Imitation Learning

The pursuit of data efficiency, where quality outweighs quantity, has emerged as a cornerstone in robotic manipulation, especially given the high costs associated with real-world data collection. We propose that maximizing the informational density of individual demonstrations can dramatically reduce reliance on large-scale datasets while improving task performance. To this end, we introduce Adversarial Data Collection, a Human-in-the-Loop (HiL) framework that redefines robotic data acquisition through real-time, bidirectional human-environment interactions. Unlike conventional pipelines that passively record static demonstrations, ADC adopts a collaborative perturbation paradigm: during a single episode, an adversarial operator dynamically alters object states, environmental conditions, and linguistic commands, while the tele-operator adaptively adjusts actions to overcome these evolving challenges. This process compresses diverse failure-recovery behaviors, compositional task variations, and environmental perturbations into minimal demonstrations. Our experiments demonstrate that ADC-trained models achieve superior compositional generalization to unseen task instructions, enhanced robustness to perceptual perturbations, and emergent error recovery capabilities. Strikingly, models trained with merely 20% of the demonstration volume collected through ADC significantly outperform traditional approaches using full datasets. These advances bridge the gap between data-centric learning paradigms and practical robotic deployment, demonstrating that strategic data acquisition, not merely post-hoc processing, is critical for scalable, real-world robot learning. Additionally, we are curating a large-scale ADC-Robotics dataset comprising real-world manipulation tasks with adversarial perturbations. This benchmark will be open-sourced to facilitate advancements in robotic imitation learning.

arxiv.org
Here's the punchline from my talk for @vitalik.eth's d/acc Day: How each ~generation of the 20th century scored on the three core principles of d/acc.

The talk was a whirlwind tour of how society has thought about progress, decentralization & risk over the last 150 years.

Starts here, runs about 7 minutes: https://youtube.com/live/b45hakfN1cM?t=2939s
/e/acc
I'll be speaking at @vitalik.eth's “d/acc Day” at Berkeley on Thursday

My talk: “d/acc: The first 150 years.” A whirlwind tour of how society has thought about progress, decentralization and defense over the last century and a half

Should be livestreamed and recorded

https://lu.ma/o99rcou9
/e/acc
What’s the solution e/acc?
Loading...
/e/acc
The Techno-Humanist Manifesto, Chapter 5: Solutionism (part 2)

There is no tradeoff between health/safety and progress, because health and safety are a part of progress. But the technical work of health and safety has gone mostly unsung

https://newsletter.rootsofprogress.org/p/solutionism-part-2
/e/acc
Can you feel the acceleration?
https://imagedelivery.net/BXluQx4ige9GuW0Ia56BHw/c75b19ee-3f86-470e-95de-972e06355000/original
Save the date: Progress Conference 2025 will be October 16–19 in Berkeley, CA

Hosted by the Roots of Progress Institute together with the Abundance Institute, the Foresight Institute, the Foundation for American Innovation, HumanProgress, the Institute for Humane Studies, and Works in Progress magazine.

Speakers and more details to be announced this spring.

https://rootsofprogress.org/conference
/e/acc
I'm curious how this plays out, whether it quickly facilitates deep speculation, or quickly displaces routine corporate procedure (e.g. patent hijinks).

phi-4-multimodal looks promising, besides gemini-2. always an open question when mobile reasoning can collaborate en masse.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.18864
https://imagedelivery.net/BXluQx4ige9GuW0Ia56BHw/10cf4c6d-f161-4f94-182e-50da6ea7d400/original

Towards an AI co-scientist

Scientific discovery relies on scientists generating novel hypotheses that undergo rigorous experimental validation. To augment this process, we introduce an AI co-scientist, a multi-agent system built on Gemini 2.0. The AI co-scientist is intended to help uncover new, original knowledge and to formulate demonstrably novel research hypotheses and proposals, building upon prior evidence and aligned to scientist-provided research objectives and guidance. The system's design incorporates a generate, debate, and evolve approach to hypothesis generation, inspired by the scientific method and accelerated by scaling test-time compute. Key contributions include: (1) a multi-agent architecture with an asynchronous task execution framework for flexible compute scaling; (2) a tournament evolution process for self-improving hypotheses generation. Automated evaluations show continued benefits of test-time compute, improving hypothesis quality. While general purpose, we focus development and validation in three biomedical areas: drug repurposing, novel target discovery, and explaining mechanisms of bacterial evolution and anti-microbial resistance. For drug repurposing, the system proposes candidates with promising validation findings, including candidates for acute myeloid leukemia that show tumor inhibition in vitro at clinically applicable concentrations. For novel target discovery, the AI co-scientist proposed new epigenetic targets for liver fibrosis, validated by anti-fibrotic activity and liver cell regeneration in human hepatic organoids. Finally, the AI co-scientist recapitulated unpublished experimental results via a parallel in silico discovery of a novel gene transfer mechanism in bacterial evolution. These results, detailed in separate, co-timed reports, demonstrate the potential to augment biomedical and scientific discovery and usher an era of AI empowered scientists.

arxiv.org
A crypto investor reached out to me and is interested in “funding a research paper about tokenization as a new mechanism for funding science moonshots.” He has some notes/ideas, but thinks it should be written up as an econ paper

He has $40k to devote to this. DC me if interested or if you have a referral
/e/acc
I gave a talk to high schoolers:

The Future of Humanity—And How You Can Help

We hear a lot about disaster scenarios, from pandemic diseases to catastrophic climate change. Is humanity doomed? Or can we solve these challenges, and even create a future that is better than the world has ever seen? I make the case for problem-solving, based on both history and theory, and conclude by pointing towards some of the most important problems and opportunities to work on, to create the best possible future for humanity.

https://youtu.be/3Sm7qHd_Qy0
/e/acc
I go away for three weeks and everyone announces everything:

Boom first supersonic flight
OpenAI Deep Research and GPT-5 roadmap
Derek Thompson & Ezra Klein's *Abundance*
Charles Mann's “How the System Works”
Jason Carman's Story Company
Jack Despain Zhou's Center for Educational Progress

And much more in my latest links digest: https://newsletter.rootsofprogress.org/p/links-and-short-notes-2025-02-17
/e/acc
who wants to form the Physics Party?
Loading...
the future of power is solar (and we should make policy around power more effective by subsidizing solar): https://x.com/CJHandmer/status/1886585060373225967
The Techno-Humanist Manifesto, Chapter 5: Solutionism (part 1)

Optimism vs. pessimism can be a false dichotomy. We need to fully acknowledge problems, while vigorously pursuing solutions. Call it “solutionism”

https://newsletter.rootsofprogress.org/p/solutionism-part-1
/e/acc
https://x.com/neuralink/status/1885092134157529193
I cannot wait to use this as another hotkey for copying, switching tabs, and pasting.
On the incremental path to the future, a major trend will be that humans step up a level, into management.

Here I start to lay out a vision for human agency in the AI future:

https://newsletter.rootsofprogress.org/p/the-future-of-humanity-is-in-management
/e/acc