nouns-protocol
/nouns-protocol180
Post new ideas and feedback on protocol changes, earn ETH: https://rounds.wtf/nouns-protocol/nouns-protocol-summer-24-round-1-1
someone just texted me saying the nouns.wtf is currently broken, i’m honored they assume i’m somehow involved in the nouns web app (im not)
but wanted to flag it here for you nouners
but wanted to flag it here for you nouners
long term I want to make the nouns dao executor the owner of these new flow contracts
but they're on @base
is there anything simple i can do to give the DAO more ownership over them without having to have the entire DAO move over?
but they're on @base
is there anything simple i can do to give the DAO more ownership over them without having to have the entire DAO move over?
The biggest outstanding question on our Nouns proposal for streaming grants continues to be:
How do we structure the recursive stream tree and decide the list of approved grants recipients in each pool?
Luckily, there's a mechanism out there for aligning incentives around the creation of lists.
nouns.camp/proposals/582 prop updated 🤝
How do we structure the recursive stream tree and decide the list of approved grants recipients in each pool?
Luckily, there's a mechanism out there for aligning incentives around the creation of lists.
nouns.camp/proposals/582 prop updated 🤝
What's the latest thinking on L2? I feel like the 7 day delay going from L2 -> mainnet is a big limitation. But being able to spin up gov related contracts on L2 (contract based nouncil for example) would be cool to reduce costs a bit. Just not sure how it gets done, wonder if anyone has any thinking here.
Rough ideas after reading: https://mirror.xyz/verbsteam.eth/gnTdSqqiZC7OmqL8Dix-hEek5Sim1abC1BsZNm9_h-s
I think the key design challenge here is not requiring people to place their NOUN in a new contract.
Off the cuff ideas
- Could update governor to have an exclude list
- People who delegate to a pool, get a soulbound NFT which prevents double vote problem
- Burn soulbound NFT to get normal voting privileges again
- Governor lists known pool contracts similar to well-known Clients
I think the key design challenge here is not requiring people to place their NOUN in a new contract.
Off the cuff ideas
- Could update governor to have an exclude list
- People who delegate to a pool, get a soulbound NFT which prevents double vote problem
- Burn soulbound NFT to get normal voting privileges again
- Governor lists known pool contracts similar to well-known Clients
any justification from the team here?
I can only speak for myself but I deliberately spent time thinking and interacting with protocol channel because there was such a strong reward. It feels like a horrible precedent to set that you can change the rewards after the round ends.
I can only speak for myself but I deliberately spent time thinking and interacting with protocol channel because there was such a strong reward. It feels like a horrible precedent to set that you can change the rewards after the round ends.
Loading...
sorry to be annoying about this but the round closed 4 days ago
@seneca maybe make it so it's not possible to start a round without depositing the reward
@seneca maybe make it so it's not possible to start a round without depositing the reward
Loading...
another beautiful and Green day ready the stage for Music band
#touchgrass
@kamyab92 @danialkol @mamadkj recast and like o comment plz
#touchgrass
@kamyab92 @danialkol @mamadkj recast and like o comment plz
Is the protocol round going to be topped up 👉👈
a huge pleasure to see the mechanics of nouns protocol running behind the scenes. i would say it is pure art in the same way we get stucked & enchanted in front our screens appreciating so many wonderful stuff.
Hey i just try our site and its great
impressed and good I like the features offered by the team, as a user I feel very comfortable and easly to understand great @el4d 🔥🔥
impressed and good I like the features offered by the team, as a user I feel very comfortable and easly to understand great @el4d 🔥🔥
Slashing Mechanism for Nouns
Deposit-to-Propose: Requires a deposit proportional to Community Interest (CI) or the size of the ask.
Proposal Success: Deposit is reclaimed if the proposal succeeds.
Proposal Failure: Deposit enters a queue where anyone can vote to withhold it, weighted by noun age, with a dynamic quorum curve.
Motivation:
High-cost malicious proposals are a significant risk.
Proposal spam could rise as supply and swapping increase.
Increasing proposal thresholds slows governance and centralizes power without deterring attacks.
Encouraging diverse, good faith proposals is beneficial.
Low-cost proposals are generally low-risk, but protocol-change proposals may need special handling.
Deposit-to-Propose: Requires a deposit proportional to Community Interest (CI) or the size of the ask.
Proposal Success: Deposit is reclaimed if the proposal succeeds.
Proposal Failure: Deposit enters a queue where anyone can vote to withhold it, weighted by noun age, with a dynamic quorum curve.
Motivation:
High-cost malicious proposals are a significant risk.
Proposal spam could rise as supply and swapping increase.
Increasing proposal thresholds slows governance and centralizes power without deterring attacks.
Encouraging diverse, good faith proposals is beneficial.
Low-cost proposals are generally low-risk, but protocol-change proposals may need special handling.
✅ Nouns Protocol Summer '24: Round 1 Closing Soon
As we approach the end of Round 1, it’s crucial to address the known flaw in the Nouns protocol. Inviting developers, designers, and all creative minds to collaborate is a thoughtful approach. Let’s specifically engage Nouns holders—they are deeply invested in improving the protocol. Together, we can establish better connections with technical experts and developers to enhance our beloved Nouns ecosystem. ⌐◨-◨
Let’s unite our efforts within the Nouns community. By collaborating, sharing insights, and involving technical experts and developers, we can elevate the Nouns protocol to new heights. Together, we’ll shape an ecosystem that thrives and inspires.
⌐◨-◨ ⌐◨-◨ ⌐◨-◨ ⌐◨-◨ ⌐◨-◨ ⌐◨-◨ ⌐◨-◨ ⌐◨-◨ ⌐◨-◨ ⌐◨-◨
As we approach the end of Round 1, it’s crucial to address the known flaw in the Nouns protocol. Inviting developers, designers, and all creative minds to collaborate is a thoughtful approach. Let’s specifically engage Nouns holders—they are deeply invested in improving the protocol. Together, we can establish better connections with technical experts and developers to enhance our beloved Nouns ecosystem. ⌐◨-◨
Let’s unite our efforts within the Nouns community. By collaborating, sharing insights, and involving technical experts and developers, we can elevate the Nouns protocol to new heights. Together, we’ll shape an ecosystem that thrives and inspires.
⌐◨-◨ ⌐◨-◨ ⌐◨-◨ ⌐◨-◨ ⌐◨-◨ ⌐◨-◨ ⌐◨-◨ ⌐◨-◨ ⌐◨-◨ ⌐◨-◨
Nouns Next-Gen Academy: A Web3 Learning Hub To On-board The Next Generation.
An open source platform where contributors are welcomed to create simplified and basic web3/ blockchain resources for the next generation, while we on-board them.
An open source platform where contributors are welcomed to create simplified and basic web3/ blockchain resources for the next generation, while we on-board them.
Hey everyone! I'm really excited about this opportunity to contribute to protocol changes. One idea I have is to improve the efficiency of smart contract executions by optimizing gas fees. This could make transactions more cost-effective and streamline processes for users. Looking forward to sharing more ideas and collaborating with all the brilliant minds here!
I feel like standing bids are an interesting design space. With enough bids they could be useful for projecting auction revenue and help guide how much to spend. And long-term standing bids would signal strong nouns interest/alignment, could be used to suggest governance delegates for inactive holders
Loading...
Suggestion for Countdown Display Enhancement
The current countdown timer looks impressive.
However, to enhance user experience, I propose adding the exact deadline date when rounds end. This information should be displayed alongside the countdown timer.
Additionally, incorporating a feature that adjusts the deadline date to the local time zone of the viewer would make it more user-friendly for a global audience. This improvement will ensure clarity and convenience for all participants.
The current countdown timer looks impressive.
However, to enhance user experience, I propose adding the exact deadline date when rounds end. This information should be displayed alongside the countdown timer.
Additionally, incorporating a feature that adjusts the deadline date to the local time zone of the viewer would make it more user-friendly for a global audience. This improvement will ensure clarity and convenience for all participants.
