7074
Tarun Chitra

@pinged #7074

ヽ(⌐■_■)ノ♪♬ @ @gauntlet/🤖Ventures/tldr/Aera \\ ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ Struggling with the nature of randomness \\ main: @gaa \\ /red-bull /defi-research maxi
38928 Follower 201 Following
OH: “Is sreeramkannan.twitter describing Eigenlayer as a fat Cantor set?”

https://t.co/YbxtbnQ7AD
Today's news using a paper from 2013
OH: "As rates are going down, what's the opposite of a ZIRP? A HIRP? Herpes?"
Did SmokeyTheBera.twitter open up a fashion brand in Brooklyn?
OH: "Crypto would be legal in China if the coin was called $MOODENGXIAOPING instead of $MOODENG"
Honestly, I can't believe that SBF was front-run for the honor of being the first person to do this by someone who bought a lot of gold bars with stolen money

https://t.co/aUFUWONEI8
What does restaking have to do with credit trading and the Lovasz Local Lemma? If you're in Thailand find out here (thanks soona.twitter!)
Having learned so much over the years from PrivacyScaling.twitter and barrywhitehat.twitter’s writings, there’s a mix of melancholy, nostalgia, and hope for the future in reading this — wish everyone the best 🥺

https://t.co/k2xt4GL5wT
Who do you think are the most savage technical authors?

I think this author (you have to guess who it is) has been the most consistently savage by taking digs at every field they’ve written in
Which technical authors do you think are most savage towards the deficiencies of prior work in their introductions?

My first place award goes to John Duchi
OH: “Why do all these finance bros call a billion dollars a yard? Are they going to call $100 billion a touchdown”
Even though Brat Summer is over, never forget that Green-Schwarz-Witten was the original brat
OH: “All the MEV participant on MEV participant violence today on the timeline suggests that no one is making enough money until the election”
Doomers in California are clearly just better at politics than techno-optimists; But I am excited for the rest of the world to take this insanely large research and economic opportunity handed over to them by numerically dyslexic bureaucrats https://t.co/B4LYuFFivr
Nash equivalent of this is coming last in WSOP 😂 https://t.co/Ca4X2oLUzy
Eventually Verifier’s Dilemma proves “eventually” isn’t a useful security definition (sorry distributed systems people!) https://t.co/40e5NzmfJg
Has been fun to watch MingXDynasty.twitter and 0xringwraith10.twitter work on probabilistic extensions of the recent spate of restaking risk papers 🫡 https://t.co/jFRJ5yGKJK
First Telegram, Second Mistral, and then ______________

(I’ve been embarrassed about being American for privacy violations by the government for years — but I’ve never thought, ‘thank fucking god I’m not French’ until this week) https://t.co/PyhR5y7iEX
The beauty of all the "Ethereum doesn't care about DeFi" arguments is that people are finally understanding the frailty of PoS economics and the inherent opportunity costs from a different lens (which applies to all PoS networks equally)
OH: "What if 'Future of France' was the wrong country/continent for (private) DeFi?"
OH (Asian Dev): "Finally, Ethcc will move somewhere where people wear deodorant"
The 1st order reason for diminishing returns on staked security is that at large enough % of network staked you severely reduce liquidity and alternative lending yields on the staked asset to the point of making the opportunity cost of staking (lost yield elsewhere) de minimis https://t.co/yGdsDrx7E7